- PRISM is a national security electronic surveillance program
- PRISM is operated by the United National Security Agency (NSA) since 2007 PRISM has allowed the government unprecedented access to your personal information for at least the last six years.
- The existence of the program was leaked by NSA contractor Edward Snowden Microsoft.
- Yahoo. Google. Facebook. PalTalk. AOL. Skype. YouTube. Apple are the associated companies.
PRISM is a clandestine national
security electronic surveillance program
operated by the United States National Security
Agency (NSA)
since 2007.
PRISM is a government codename for a data collection effort known officially as US-984XN
PRISM is a covert collaboration between the NSA,
FBI, and nearly every tech company you rely on daily. PRISM has allowed the
government unprecedented access to your personal information for at least the
last six years.
The
existence of the program was leaked by NSA contractor Edward
Snowden and published
by The Guardian and The Washington Post on June 6, 2013.
A document included in the leak indicated that PRISM
was "the number one source of raw intelligence used for NSA analytic
reports."
So what PRISM is all
about ?
In the months and early years after 9/11, FBI agents
began showing up at Microsoft Corp. more frequently than before, armed with
court orders demanding information on customers.
Around the world, government
spies and eavesdroppers were tracking the email and Internet addresses used by
suspected terrorists. Often, those trails led to the world's largest software
company and, at the time, largest email provider.
The agents wanted email
archives, account information, practically everything, and quickly.
According to leaked documents, it went into effect
in 2007, and has only gained momentum since. Its stated purpose is to monitor
potentially valuable foreign communications that might pass through US servers,
but it appears that in practice its scope was far greater.
Companies Associated?
Microsoft. Yahoo. Google. Facebook. PalTalk. AOL.
Skype. YouTube. Apple. If you've interacted with any of those companies in the
last six years, that information is vulnerable under PRISM.
Initial public statements
Corporate
executives of several companies identified in the leaked documents told The
Guardian that they had no knowledge of the PRISM program in particular
and also denied making information available to the government on the scale
alleged by news reports. Statements of several of the companies named in
the leaked documents were reported :
·
Microsoft: "We provide customer data only when we receive a
legally binding order or subpoena to do so, and never on a voluntary basis. In
addition we only ever comply with orders for requests about specific accounts
or identifiers. If the government has a broader voluntary national security
program to gather customer data we don't participate in it."
·
Yahoo!: "Yahoo! takes users' privacy very seriously. We do
not provide the government with direct access to our servers, systems, or
network. "Of the hundreds of millions of users we serve, an infinitesimal
percentage will ever be the subject of a government data collection
directive."
·
Facebook: "We do not provide any government organization with
direct access to Facebook servers. When Facebook is asked for data or
information about specific individuals, we carefully scrutinize any such
request for compliance with all applicable laws, and provide information only
to the extent required by law."
·
Google: "Google cares deeply about the security of our users'
data. We disclose user data to government in accordance with the law, and we
review all such requests carefully. From time to time, people allege that we
have created a government ‘back door' into our systems, but Google
does not have a backdoor for the government to access private user data. "[A]ny
suggestion that Google is disclosing information about our users' Internet
activity on such a scale is completely false.”
·
Dropbox: "We've seen reports that Dropbox might be asked to
participate in a government program called PRISM. We are not part of any such
program and remain committed to protecting our users' privacy."
How PRISM works?
Americans who disapprove of the
government reading their emails have more to worry about from a different and
larger NSA effort that snatches data as it passes through the fiber optic
cables that make up the Internet's backbone. That program, which has been known
for years, copies Internet traffic as it enters and leaves the United States,
then routes it to the NSA for analysis.
Deep in the oceans, hundreds of cables carry much of
the world's phone and Internet traffic. Since at least the early 1970s, the NSA
has been tapping foreign cables. It doesn't need permission. That's its job.
But Internet data doesn't care
about borders. Send an email from Pakistan to Afghanistan and it might pass
through a mail server in the United States, the same computer that handles
messages to and from Americans. The NSA is prohibited from spying on Americans
or anyone inside the United States. That's the FBI's job and it requires a
warrant.
Despite that prohibition,
shortly after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, President George W. Bush secretly
authorized the NSA to plug into the fiber optic cables that enter and leave the
United States, knowing it would give the government unprecedented, warrantless
access to Americans' private conversations.
Tapping into those cables
allows the NSA access to monitor emails, telephone calls, video chats,
websites, bank transactions and more. It takes powerful computers to decrypt,
store and analyze all this information, but the information is all there,
zipping by at the speed of light.
When the NSA monitors phone records, it reportedly
only collects the metadata therein. That includes to and from whom the calls
were made, where the calls came from, and other generalized info. Importantly,
as far as we know, the actual content of the calls was off-limits.
By contrast, PRISM apparently allows full access not
just to the fact that an email or chat was sent, but also the contents of those emails and chats. According to the Washington Post's source, they can "literally watch you as you type." They could be doing it right now.
The Protect America Act of 2007 made it possible for
targets to be electronically surveilled without a warrant if they were
"reasonably believed" to be foreign. That's where that 51% comes in.
It was followed by the 2008 FISA Amendments Act, which immunized companies from
legal harm for handing information over to the government. And that's the
one-two punch that gives PRISM full legal standing.
No comments:
Post a Comment